- Car trouble - 3rd February 2026
- ‘Ch-ch-changes’ copyright D. Bowie - 2nd February 2026
- I predict another riot… - 30th January 2026
Disturbing news that BBC executives are planning to spend millions on taxis, puts centre stage how the giant corporation has also hit the headlines for all the wrong reasons following numerous scandals, but they REFUSE to answer The Eye’s questions about them.
Bosses at the huge organisation are preparing to splash out up to £63 million on taxis for staff and presenters – despite warning they must slash £150 million from programme budgets.
The eye-watering spend will fund a 24/7 cab service for employees, on-screen talent, guests and equipment under a new five-year contract advertised on a UK Government procurement website.
The deal, equivalent to the cost of more than 361,000 TV licences, has been divided into two lucrative lots, along with other categories. One is for an app-based ‘ride-hail’ service estimated to be worth £35.5 million, while a second contract worth £17 million will cover pre-booked journeys across the UK and overseas.
However this is not the first time controversy has been caused at a corporation where our Editor, Welshman Phil Parry, spent 23 years, and he has been left reeling by what has happened.
He declared: “When I worked on network programmes in London we would have a fleet of special BBC cars waiting outside the building to take us to our destination, but if one was unavailable we were always encouraged to ride in taxis.
“On one occasion, working for Panorama, I was picked up from the airport in Rome in a chauffeur-driven Mercedes Benz with leather seats, and whisked straight to my hotel. It was incredible!”.
This kind of news will be something the corporation wants like a hole in the head, after it endured a string of scandals, and news now that Martin Clunes is to portray disgraced former BBC presenter Huw Edwards in a new drama about one of them.
Edwards was spared jail in September 2024 despite admitting three counts of making indecent images of children, receiving instead a six-month custodial term suspended for two years.
He had pleaded guilty months earlier to accessing indecent photographs of children, having left the BBC on medical grounds.
The court heard he had described vile child abuse videos sent to him as “amazing” – and responded “go on” when offered images of a boy aged approximately eight years old.
Among the 41 images he admitted possessing, seven were classified as Category A, the most serious classification.
Edwards was widely condemned, yet there has also been contentious action (or INACTION!).
Before his conviction the Gorsedd recorder, or secretary, Christine James had said the issue would be ‘discussed’ when it met, and that it “does not have a process or a specified mechanism to expel members”. In a statement Ms James stated: “In such matters, the Gorsedd is subject to the Eisteddfod Court”.
However this provoked fury, and one whistleblower who is close to senior management at the Eisteddfod, declared in Welsh to The Eye: “This is unbelievable. Haven’t these people heard of telephones or conference calls?!”. It was also said: “Oh for God’s sake! The managers really are IDIOTS! People don’t care about ‘processes’, just that they have honoured a paedophile. if there is no process for getting rid of people, we need a new one. The current situation is bad for the Eisteddfod, and bad for Wales”.
Meanwhile the contentious former Director General (DG) of the BBC Tim Davie has defended his corporation’s handling of the Edwards issue, when it had paid him hundreds of thousands of pounds even though it knew he had been arrested on child pornography charges.
The BBC were also to keep the BAFTAs won for Royal coverage fronted by Edwards, and individual awards he received would ‘remain under review’
Apart from being honoured by the Gorsedd, Edwards was also given honorary degrees by the universities of Bangor as well as Cardiff.
Cardiff University (CU) said after the guilty plea it was only “actively reviewing procedures in relation to the honorary fellowship award and his position as an honorary professor”.
Bangor University (BU) also announced that it was merely ‘reviewing’ the honorary fellowship it had granted Edwards, and The Learned Society of Wales (LSW) said, too, that it was ‘reviewing’ his fellowship in the wake of his guilty plea. The Royal Welsh College of Music and Drama and Swansea University (SU) have said they were not able to comment..
All of this has come despite insiders condemning executives. One said they were “disappointed” not to have heard more about an internal inquiry’s progress, a further critic said that it felt like “things have been swept under the carpet”.
The background is extraordinary. On a different issue, Edwards was suspended in July 2023 after reports in The Sun said he had paid a young person for sexually explicit images. These condemnatory remarks are in the wake of what is now known about him. His admission of what he did made the front page of almost every single UK newspaper.
There has also been consternation about why he was a hero to some in the Welsh nationalist or independence communities. One leading Public Relations (PR) and marketing official who wished to remain anonymous, told The Eye: “It has always seemed incredible to me, and now this just emphasises it. In the past we have even had Welsh nationalist or independence clients wanting to put Huw Edwards’ face on their products!”.
In one announcement on Twitter/X Edwards highlighted (ironically): “The wacky world where Wales was never a nation and Pembrokeshire is the heartland of… Plaid Cymru. Help!”. The picture he attached underneath it, was of protesters carrying Welsh flags aloft with a placard of END LONDON RULE clearly visible near the centre of the photograph.
He was ordered to drop a post of himself in front of a Welsh flag, which he proclaimed (once more ironically) was a “backdrop for @BBCNews at Ten”, and responded (again ironically): “Gutted my pro-flag tweet has been cut down in its prime. By order. But it will be back tomorrow – by popular demand. Meanwhile enjoy this magnificent flag – one of my favourites. Hashtag SixNationsRugby Hashtag FRAvWAL” – with a series of emojis included.
His comments, though, have not been met with wild acclaim by the leader of the Welsh Conservatives in the Welsh Parliament/Senedd Cymru (WP/SC) Andrew RT Davies, who has said on Twitter/X that The BBC was: “Employing presenters who openly mock… (Britain)… Ridiculous!”, and linked it to the ‘Gutted’ post.
He has ‘liked’ a tweet declaring that he should be “President of an Independent Cymru”, apparently flying in the face of the rules on impartiality, and there was also a call on the internet for Edwards to be knighted because of his presentation of a Royal funeral.
He attacked a critique of the break-up of the UK by celebrated historian and journalist Max Hastings. Edwards tweeted that there were “errors”. After Edwards’ diatribe opposing Mr Hastings, the website Nation.Cymru (NC) (which is supported by the taxpayer) published a ‘news’ piece saying: “Huw Edwards slams former Telegraph editor for anti-Welsh language article”, and it has ‘reported’ many ‘stories’ about his exploits. For example, following a remark about Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru (Plaid), it ran a ‘story’ that: “Broadcaster Huw Edwards has protested the BBC’s new rules on using social media by unleashing a cascade of Welsh flags”.
The exposure of Edwards, and now the disclosure of the unbelievable amount planned for taxi services, caused a huge storm because they have come after his sentence, as well as it being revealed that he had been paid between £475,000 and £479,999 in the 2023-24 financial year, making him the broadcaster’s third-highest-paid presenter overall.
He was only ASKED to give some of it back. In a letter to staff the BBC Chair Samir Shah said that Edwards had “behaved in bad faith” (surely an under-statement!), saying that the corporation believed he had taken his salary despite knowing he was to plead guilty to the offences.
Edwards, formerly the BBC’s most high-profile newsreader, continued to earn his salary for FIVE months after he was arrested on three counts of making indecent images of children, during which time he was paid more than £200,000.
He had allegedly given £35,000 to a teenager in exchange for the sexually explicit images, and when he was finally ‘outed’ by his wife a news item about it stated: “Vicky Flind, the wife of news reader Huw Edwards, has named him as the BBC presenter facing allegations over payments for sexually explicit images in a statement issued on his behalf”.
Harmful claims then emerged about Edwards’ actions generally at the BBC, with it being claimed that he had sent ‘menacing’ texts to one individual, and further allegations emerged following the original ones made in The Sun (the paper said it had a dossier of his alleged activities, but has chosen not to publish).
He was also accused of sending inappropriate messages to BBC employees. According to Newsnight, one current staff member claimed they were contacted on social media by him, and the messages left them feeling uncomfortable as well as awkward. The messages were reportedly suggestive in nature, appeared to be flirtatious, and referred to the appearance of Mr Edwards’ colleague. “There is a power dynamic that makes this inappropriate”, the staff member said. Another BBC employee alleged that Mr Edwards had also sent them a private message on social media which commented, too, on their appearance and gave them a “cold shudder”.
During the days in which Edwards went unnamed as the presenter at the centre of the alleged sex scandal, Mr Borkowski told Times Radio: “We’ve got a situation where it’s an ongoing car crash and the BBC is so glacial about how they’re dealing with this, because this is a 21st century problem”, David Keighley, the former BBC news producer and director of News-watch, spoke of “reputational damage” to the man’s colleagues.
Journalists who covered the extraordinary incident, have apparently endorsed criticism that the BBC effectively clammed up about it. For instance, one Sky News journalist said at the time: “The fact all of us broadcasters have asked, have put in requests again and again to speak to the director general, and the fact that he has only given an interview to his own people is not a good look for the BBC”.
Yet senior executives seemingly took a different view. During a pre-arranged House of Lords (HoL) Communications Committee (CC) hearing about a week afterwards, the BBC’s Mr Davie, said: “We have been in touch with the complainant”, and that due to the “history of this industry… we should all be concerned and appropriately diligent around the abuse of people in powerful positions”.
In that hearing he sat alongside acting chairwoman, Dame Elan Closs Stephens (who, like Edwards, is from Wales). She and Mr Davie were forced to answer important questions about the corporation’s attitude during the affair, following suggestions that it did not properly investigate the original complaint. Dame Elan told peers that despite “huge pressure”to name Edwards, the corporation “had a duty to act with some calm and rationality in the face of lack of rationality and lack of calm”. She was BBC chair for almost all of the period in question.
A spoof mock up of a former BBC logo which circulated on the internet may not have been accurate, but showed the depths the corporation’s reputation sank to in the eyes of the public. It said: “BBC – Blokes Bumming Children”.
After the Edwards story broke, this was the (extremely polite) request Phil put to their Media Office (MO) on December 19 2024, and he was encouraged because on the BBC’s website it is declared: “Enquiries from journalists will be responded to as quickly as possible”.
Hello.
I am Editor of a news website called The Eye.
Could you please answer the following questions:
1. In the light of the Gregg Wallace, and other affairs, what, if any, programmes are now not to be transmitted, and how many of them are there?
2. What, if any, changes have been made to your Whistleblowers’ Charter, and what are the dates of these?
3. What, if any, changes have been made to your safeguarding policies, and what are the dates of these?
Statements can be made by return to this address – it is checked constantly and is totally secure.
Thank you,
Phil Parry
To date, though, there has been NO reply apart from two automated messages saying that the requests had been received.
Perhaps questions like these are too difficult to handle, when shock news is being made in UK newspapers about the millions to be splurged on taxis, even as the BBC is cutting programme budgets, and has suffered a series of high-profile scandals…
The memories of Phil’s astounding, decades long award-winning career in journalism (including his years at the BBC), as he was gripped by the rare neurological disabling condition Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), have been released in a major book ‘A Good Story’. Order it now.
Tomorrow – more problems for the BBC as one of its disgraced former stars says ‘sorry’ for his appalling behaviour, but doesn’t really apologise…
