- Behind the headlines… - 4th November 2025
- A dim view - 4th November 2025
- On a budget… - 3rd November 2025
The publication today of a long-delayed into the terrible activities of paedophile Neil Foden highlights the horrendous level of online abuse suffered by The Eye and our Editor Phil Parry, including from another figure jailed for possessing indecent images of children.
It also puts centre stage the importance of standing up to influential people, and for Phil resorting to legal action on occasions when faced with these insults.
Foden, from Old Colwyn in Conwy, was jailed for 17 years after being convicted of 19 charges involving four girls.
He was described as “depraved”, “arrogant” and a “bully” by the trial judge when he was sentenced in July last year following a month-long trial, and a Child Practice Review (which has just been published) was commissioned by the North Wales Safeguarding Board, with prominent expert Jan Pickles appointed to lead the independent investigation.
Foden was a school head teacher who was able to sexually abuse girls for years, and her report found there were more than 50 “missed opportunities” to intervene and stop him.
The judge in the shocking case, Rhys Rowlands, said Foden was a “bombastic and domineering character” with “an obsession with young teenage girls“.
He suggested during sentencing that the lack of action may have “emboldened” him to continue his behaviour.
Sadly these are not the only examples of appalling actions by individuals in Wales.
For example the lobbyist Daran Hill was found with 62 indecent images of children, among them eight in the most serious category after being arrested by the National Crime Agency (NCA) in 2021.
This was the opening sentence in the website WalesOnline’s (WO) report about his imprisonment: “A paedophile who used to work as a top political consultant distributed sickening images of child abuse as young as three years old to others on the internet”.
As this hard-hitting item makes clear, Hill shared many of the images with other users on a social messaging platform, and even after admitting his crimes, he was jailed for three years and four months, with only half of this sentence to be served on licence.
When police arrived at Hill’s home in Cardiff, he told them: “I know why you’re here. I made a mistake”.
Hill was the national organiser of the Yes for Wales campaign for the devolution referendum in 1997, then campaign director of the Yes campaign in the 2011 vote on giving the assembly primary legislative powers.
He was managing director at Positif, which advised companies seeking to lobby Welsh politicians.
The month after his arrest he resigned as director of the company, which was renamed Camlas later.
As with Foden, his jailing has prompted huge inquiries into past behaviour.
The former Plaid Cymru (PC) Assembly Member and Director of Deryn Consulting (a Public Relations [PR] outfit) Nerys Evans tweeted a news item about Hill, saying: “This makes me sick to my stomach and makes my blood boil. This evil man, his crimes, his behaviour, and the people around him, who enabled, supported and kept quiet about him in welsh politcs and in the welsh media should be ashamed”.
Cathy Owens, another Director of Deryn, wrote on Twitter/X accompanying a different report about the antics of Hill said: “A decade of crap from this guy, amplified by chums and acolytes across politics/media. Might not have known extent of depravity, but they knew about his misogyny, bullying, appalling influence. Thinking about his victims, and those dismissed and denigrated when they spoke out”.
But enormous concern has been shown on social media that, like Foden, Hill had managed to sway opinion-formers for a long time.
Linking her comments to a piece in WO, an angry Ms Owens also proclaimed on Twitter/X: “I’d be fascinated to know exactly how many times this fella and his cronies worked on stories with @WalesOnline to try and take us out. It’s not as if we didn’t lay it out for you”.
Even before Hill had been exposed for the appalling crime he had committed, he had been one of those who had abused Phil, calling him “bitter”, and (ironically) a “misogynist” (misspelt) on Twitter/X forcing him to take legal action after which a fulsome apology was forthcoming.
His public insults of Phil are as nothing compared to what he has been found to have done and (like Foden) been jailed for, but they do, unfortunately, fall into a familiar pattern and a personal statement has had to be issued.
Phil’s Wikipedia entry has been vandalised to include the words ‘tool’ and ‘knob head’, and he has been compared on Twitter/X to the comedy broadcaster Alan Partridge.
The Wikepedia entry has now been restored to its original form, after officials removed the abusive words.
The Alan Partridge comment was by a Sion Tomos Owen whose blog describes him as: “…a bilingual TV and Radio presenter, illustrator, writer and creative workshop tutor…”.
Mr Owen said in Welsh (which Phil speaks): “There’s no way that this website (The Eye) is for real?! It’s as if a Take a Break (light magazine) story has been edited by Alan Partridge” (laughing emoji).
Another remark which concerned a television ‘reporter’ who had posted pictures of herself on social media in skimpy clothes, is sadly typical of the insults constantly received online by The Eye or by Phil personally: “Your article on Ellie Pitt was bordering on mysogynistic bullying, a really pathetic article written by a bitter individual who was a complete failiure as a BBC correspondent and also loved bashing the Catholic Church with your disgraceful Panorama programme”.
In the past Phil has also been accused (incorrectly) of being a “bastard” (many times), an “anti-devolutionist wanker”, “pure scum”, a “liar” (also many times) a “little git”, and (correctly) a “nosey git”, “irritating”, or a “nuisance”. But these remarks come amid many others. Too many, in fact, to mention.
Legal action is rarely taken (although sometimes it is, as shown after Hill’s public comment) unless the online message is particularly outrageous, and contains a libel (which most of them do).
Some can be rebutted in court using an “honest comment” defence (formerly known as “fair comment”), however most cannot, which means that any libel case is likely to be successful.
Hill and Foden know this to their cost.
Perhaps they will think about this in their jail cells, or read the report that has just come out into why a paedophile wasn’t stopped earlier…
Details of Phil’s astonishing decades-long journalistic career (when accurate stories about individuals often prompted abuse), as he was gripped by the rare neurological condition Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), have been released in an important book ‘A GOOD STORY’. Order it now.
