Home Journalism More check, check, check again…

More check, check, check again…

0
21
The Eye
Latest posts by The Eye (see all)
“I must check my sources for this story, as I have been trained to do…”

During 43 years in journalism, (when he was trained to use clear and simple language, avoiding jargon), it was always drilled into the head of our Editor Welshman Phil Parry, to check at least three times, to ensure a recollection is correct, and once again this is underlined by MORE supposed revelations coming out about the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, which will be highly embarrassing for Buckingham Palace.

In further extracts from his forthcoming book, Earl Spencer, brother of Diana, has claimed King Charles “sounded giddily elated” when he called him after her death in 1997. and he alleged the then-Prince Charles sounded like a “lottery winner”. The Earl’s book ‘Swan Song: Diana, My Sister’ is due to be published next week.

Representatives of Prince Harry have said they do not want to comment on the book and Buckingham Palace has pointed back to its response from Wednesday, when it rejected the account of Charles in the wake of Diana’s death in Paris.

In excerpts from Earl Spencer’s memoir published in the Daily Mail, he recounts being alerted to the car crash, on August 31, 1997, by a phone call from his sister in the middle of the night at his home in Cape Town, South Africa.

During the calls that followed, which confirmed the death, the then-Prince Charles telephoned him, and the book alleges: “Unlike my other callers, who were stunned, barely able to articulate their condolences and offers of help, he sounded giddily elated – like a lottery winner, I remember thinking at the time”.

In the memoir, Earl Spencer writes of his sister’s troubled marriage – claiming a friend of Diana’s had told him that on the eve of their wedding in July 1981, Prince Charles had told her he was “very happy to marry her, but… not actually in love with her”.

A Daily Mail scoop has been followed up in all of today’s papers

Things became “very difficult indeed” in the marriage early on, Earl Spencer writes, adding that he is “sure that both spouses despaired of the other at times”.

He now believes his sister had Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and as part of her condition suffered from Rejection Sensitive Dysphoria (RSD) – describing the latter as an “intense emotional pain in the face of others’ rejection or criticism”.

Following these latest disclosures, The Eye here re-publishes the story from yesterday about this extraordinary row.

 

  • .

 

When I started in journalism in 1983, a mantra was drilled into me by the instructors: “Check, check, check…”

This, of course, means that everything you publish must be triple checked to ensure it is accurate.

It is conceivable that this is emphasised by Earl Spencer’s shock allegation about (now) KING Charles soon after the death of his former wife Diana, Princess of Wales.

The Earl claimed in a new book on his sister, ‘Swan Song’, to be released next week, that a Palace aide had told him that Charles had proclaimed: “we’ll forget her (Diana) soon enough”.

An extract from his memoir was published in the Daily Mail yesterday.

In the extract, Earl Spencer said the then-Prince of Wales subjected him to a “stream of anger” after he insisted Diana would not have wanted her sons Prince William and Prince Harry, then aged 15 and 12, to walk behind her coffin during the funeral procession.

The story made news around the world

In ‘Swan Song: Diana, My Sister’, the earl said he was told by a palace aide that the late princess’ sons would walk behind her coffin, however, Earl Spencer objected to the move and claimed he received a phone call from Charles soon afterwards.

Earl Spencer wrote in the book: “He [Charles] unleashed down the phone what I have always taken to be his pent-up contempt for Diana, and his horror that the world was so bowled over by her death. ‘Rest assured,’ he hissed, ‘we’ll forget her soon enough’”.
Earlier he had said: “The aim of this book is to tell the truth about Diana from her brother’s perspective, just as I attempted to do when speaking at her funeral. As with my eulogy, I want to speak on Diana’s behalf and do so in an openly positive way”.
Journalists must triple check EVERYTHING!

The comments may or may not be a correct recollection, but clearly Buckingham Palace was unhappy, and took the rare step of issuing a public statement.

It declared: “While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss”.

Good reading material!

Whatever the truth is at the heart of this difficult issue, it is obvious that these things need to be verified (which may or may not have been done), because they can cause a tremendous stink!

Check, check, check!

 

‘Swan Song: Diana My Sister’ will be published on Tuesday in the UK, ahead of the 30th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death in Paris, next year.

Some of the stories Phil has covered over the years (when sources were always checked), as he was gripped by the rare neurological condition Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP)have been released in a a different kind of book ‘A GOOD STORY’. Order it now!

Next week – recent right wing unrest around the world against immigrants, has focused attention on how FEW people from overseas actually live in Wales, as well as the economic and cultural benefits they bring to the country, amid concern that the demonstrations might spread.