A contentious ‘comedian’ was interviewed as an ‘expert’ on the Welsh media, but did not face challenging questions about the huge controversies which have engulfed him, or how he may not be the best placed figure to change the landscape, it has emerged.
But The Eye HAVE revealed the alarming headlines surrounding this ‘comedian’ Huw Marshall, who was interviewed on a radio podcast, where he was described as a veteran of the media, yet was not questioned about unwelcome past headlines he has prompted.
Our journalists have shown how Mr Marshall (see stories next week) had made sick ‘jokes’ about a murdering gunman, used bad language to abuse foully prominent politicians (as well as our Editor Phil Parry) online, was placed under police investigation and been reprimanded by Twitter.
He is also thought to be responsible for such ‘pranks’ as having unwanted takeaways delivered to critics’ homes.
In the radio podcast ‘What Next For Wales’ Mr Marshall was asked a string of anodyne questions by the interviewer Theo Davies-Lewis, and allowed to portray himself as an ‘expert’ on the Welsh media. He was introduced as being “instrumental in some very exciting developments in this sector (the Welsh media)“. Mr Marshall was given extensive air time, to talk at length about his role as Head of Digital in the Welsh fourth channel (S4C) where he put together “a successful strategy” on digital development.
However nowhere in the podcast was he challenged about the disturbing details of his past behaviour. The episode bears an uncanny resemblance to another event, where Mr Marshall was again lauded as an ‘expert’ about the Welsh media.
He formed part of a panel on The Future of the Welsh Media at the University of South Wales (USW) in Cardiff along with Bethan (then) Jenkins AM, Martin Shipton (then) Chief Reporter of the Western Mail and Dr Ruth McElroy of USW.
The discussion was described in literature afterwards as “packed” (sic) and Ms Jenkins said: “although broadcasting is not devolved, it’s an area of great importance to public life in Wales”.
More recently Mr Marshall has become the backer of a new Welsh newspaper The National (TN), which has itself faced major problems.
Racks of it were unsold in supermarkets days after TN was released, and readers complained of difficulties in buying a copy, which highlighted the enormous task facing new publications, amid growing concern about it urging readers to give help with hiring another journalist.
One highly experienced reporter said about TN: “This is a complete nonsense. We all know how difficult it is starting a new newspaper, but asking for money from your readers to hire a reporter?! I ask you!”. Another told us: “I give it six months. It’s like the Daily News or Today (two defunct newspapers) all over again”.
Unsold editions of TN were found at different outlets around South Wales, and the worrying discovery came long after it was published. A journalist on The Eye also contacted several newsagents’ shops in North Wales to ask whether TN was stocked, but the answer was always the same – the product was being pushed, yet there was little interest and the newsagent had few copies, although there were many returns.
The cost of the newspaper had also been cut (a possible sign of problems) and the front page ‘splash’ about a “BUSINESS’ TAX BOOST” has been described to us as “incredibly dreary”. One reader told The Eye: “The price has been reduced from £1.10 to £1. The front page looks deadly dull and isn’t remotely eye-catching”.
There also appears to be an issue with actually buying TN in certain outlets around Wales. A different reader has said on Twitter it had to be taken off the shelves at Tesco in Merthyr Tydfil, while another in Cardiff declared: “Odd. In Tesco Western Avenue, Cardiff the checkout girl had to scan the barcode using her iphone…”.
Mr Marshall has a number of times urged people to become subscribers, and on one occasion he has proclaimed on Twitter: “Every penny of your subscription goes towards staffing costs…”
This unnerving information underlines the apparent crisis in recruitment at TN, which was perhaps alluded to by Mr Marshall. His newspaper has baldly announced in a headline: “Help us reach 1,000 subscribers and we’ll hire a political correspondent”.
Yet even this paltry figure seemed ambitious, as it has been revealed TN had a far lower number days before. The ‘editorial leader’ as he has been described, Gavin Thompson (who also edits The Argus in Newport) said: “Our journalism is funded by our digital subscribers. At time of writing, 430 of you had signed up to become subscribers, many taking out an annual subscription”.
Just before the launch of TN it advertised for “Digital reporters (x2), audience and content editor (x1)”, but there were severe doubts about whether a ‘national’ news service could be undertaken with this small number.
Comments on Twitter from Mr Marshall have also emphasised the difficulties in getting staff at the new Welsh newspaper, which was published both online and in a printed version. He initially stated: “If just 500 people subscribed to The National Wales they’d employ a business and economy editor…”. But four minutes later he tweeted: “Approaching 1,000 subscribers for the @nationalwales. When that target is met a dedicated political correspondent will be added to the team.”.
Even set against this bizarre background, there has been mounting concern. The long-term future for TN does not look good, and headlines from the past are likely to continue to dog it in the weeks and months to come.
A reader of the paper’s first edition (on St David’s Day) said: “It looks like the Wrexham Leader from the 1970s”, and those in authority took a pretty dim view as well. The Welsh Government (WG) minister Lee Waters (a former producer on the BBC Cymru Wales [BBC CW] radio programme Good Morning Wales [GMW]) stated on Facebook (FB): “Well I’ve just bought a copy and think its pretty dull”, which was ironic as he had wished an earlier ‘pilot’ “Best of luck”.
Indeed the reviews generally for TN have not been positive, and the neutrality of its output has been questioned, when (especially at this time) it is an important tenet of news journalism. This was the published comment by one writer online: “It (TN) starts with worthy statements about how we deserve better fearless, independent and unintimidated media in Wales and should be happy to pay for it then gives us a timid, third rate product filled mainly with political comment from compromised sources who wouldn’t know a truth if it whacked them over the head with a cricket bat. The dreadful headlines persist throughout (try “Uncertainty follows end of overseas study scheme” for size! If I ever wrote that headline I think I would have decapitated myself immediately)…”
There are also major questions about the man who first had the idea for TN, Mr Marshall, who has been described online as the “driving force” for it by the organisation it has ‘partnered’ with (The Newsquest Media Group [NMG] which is part of the giant American media corporation Gannett inc.), and who was, too, the figure behind New Media Wales (NMW).
Two people died and a police officer lost the sight in both eyes when rampaging gunman Raoul Moat shot them, yet despite this on July 8, 2010 – with him trying to escape from armed police – Mr Marshall published a message on his FB site, reading: “Hi I’m a sexy 19 year old blond (sic) from the North East of England looking for some fun. My Mr Right should be a big strong ginger man with a fiery temper and a jealous nature, who also enjoys camping and writing long letters. Another post read: “Moat reward… if he isn’t caught by next Wednesday, the rewards (sic) being doubled. It’s going to be a Raul (sic) over”.
Even in the last few months, Mr Marshall has been dubbed a “chancer” on social media, and his ‘stories’ have been accused of being “cut and pasted” from other publications by the UK satirical and investigative magazine Private Eye.
Evidently he does not know his journalist libel law (which is strange for someone involved in a new media service), because Mr Marshall has said on Twitter that Mr Parry is a ‘liar’ and an “obsessive coward”, linking the insults to an earlier piece he had written about the ‘venture’. Yet publishing these phrases to a third person (as he has done) is highly libellous – but Mr Parry’s libel lawyer knows the rules.
‘Obsessive’ appears to be a word Mr Marshall favours, and on Twitter he has stated: “Tell me about it. I’ve got more than one obsessive wierdo trawling through my tweets on a daily basis… In fact they’ll be reading this reply…”.
Mr Marshall has also called Mr Parry a “self proclaimed journalist”, which may not be libellous but is provably wrong as he trained to be a journalist in 1983 on the best newspaper course in the UK before moving into television, and has won an enormous number of awards. His long career has mostly been in other organisations (including 23 years with The BBC), and he has taken a large number of National Council for the Training of Journalists (NCTJ) exams – ones in libel among them.
After Mr Parry published an earlier factual story about his antics, Mr Marshall said on Twitter, that it was “now in the hands of the police” when the facts (unlike Mr Marshall himself) were NOT, actually, a police matter.
Mr Parry seems to have become something of a thorn in the side of Mr Marshall, because he has declared that he has a number of different Twitter accounts, but says he reserves one for items which may bother him, stating: “@marshallmedia is where I post Everton related stuff and things that upsets Phil Parry”.
Yet it has not only been Mr Parry to have irritated Mr Marshall in the past. In 2013, it was disclosed that he had made extremely offensive remarks to senior politicians on Twitter, and complaints after further comments led to reprimands by the social media company. One insult eight years ago, was directed at the Labour MS and minister Ken Skates, with another hurled at the former Liberal Democrat AM Peter Black. After Mr Skates tweeted in celebration of a one-vote council by-election victory over Plaid Cymru (PC) in Ruabon, Mr Marshall referred to him in his own tweet as a “gloating t**t”, and he described Mr Black as a “humourless (sic) t..t”as well as a “dull, tedious t..t”.
It seems the police have loomed large in Mr Marshall’s life, because on Twitter he has said he told them that he intended to make a complaint, however officers responded by informing him that they have a “responsibility to investigate any reports”.
Meanwhile, the basic plank of news journalism to be entirely neutral (because many potential readers may vote for parties other than the one you support), could be difficult for Mr Marshall, as he has been a candidate for one particular political party in the past. He was parliamentary candidate for Welsh nationalist party Plaid Cymru (PC) in Cardiff Central, but came fourth with just 748 votes, however his plans to stand for election as a councillor were scuppered when it emerged that he had posted the so-called ‘jokes’ about Moat, and published the abusive remarks to senior politicians on social media.
But the problems facing TN are no joke – and this ‘comedian’ behind it who made sick ‘jokes’ about a murdering gunman, as well as foully abusing senior politicians, will be very familiar with them.
Especially if he is portrayed as an ‘expert’ about the Welsh media landscape, but does not face challenges about the huge controversies that have engulfed him…
The memories of Phil’s astonishing decades long award-winning career in journalism (before the advent of TN or NMW) as he was gripped by the rare neurological disabling condition, Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP), have been released in a major book ‘A GOOD STORY’. Order the book now!