More Depp trouble…

The Eye
Follow Us!
Latest posts by The Eye (see all)

After 23 years with BBC Cymru Wales (BBC CW), and 38 years in journalism (when he was trained to use clear and simple language, avoiding jargon)our Editor Phil Parry knows better than most, how an important rule of journalism is that the same story must not be repeated. However, there are exceptions, and one today involves star actor Johnny Depp.

‘The scandal about this actor SHOULDN’T be ignored…’

In the past he has described how he was assisted in breaking into the South Wales Echo office car when he was a cub reporter, recalled his early career as a journalist, the importance of experience in the job, and made clear that the ‘calls’ to emergency services as well as court cases are central to any media operation.

He has also explored how poorly paid most journalism is when trainee reporters had to live in squalid flats, the vital role of expenses, and about one of his most important stories on the now-scrapped 53 year-old BBC CW TV Current Affairs series, Week In Week Out (WIWO), which won an award even after it was axed, long after his career really took off

Phil, here on BBC Cymru Wales Today in 1988, always knew how important it was to talk to people about domestic abuse

Phil has explained too how crucial it is actually to speak to people, the virtue of speed as well as accuracy, why knowledge of ‘history’ is vital, how certain material was removed from TV Current Affairs programmes when secret cameras had to be used, and some of those he has interviewed.

He has disclosed as well why investigative journalism is needed now more than ever although others have different opinions, how the pandemic played havoc with media schedules, and the importance of the hugely lower average age of some political leaders compared with when he started reporting.


Phil was always told by his News Editor not to do the SAME story TWICE!

It is an iron rule of journalism that exactly the same story must not be put out twice.

After many years in journalism this has always been drummed into me by successive news Editors (now known as ‘content’ Editors). They always said once a piece has been read through, double-checked by libel lawyers, and is published, that is it. Others are welcome to take up the cudgels after the revelations, because the reporter must move on to the next subject. Returning to a subject, with a new ‘top’ or ‘intro’ is perfectly acceptable, but publishing an identical item is not.

Phil only re-publishes the same story in special circumstances 

There are, however, exceptions, such as repeating a story for a Christmas edition, or if an issue is particularly significant.

The following one falls into both categories, so is especially pertinent.

It involves the actor Johnny Depp, who lost a libel case against a major UK newspaper which said he had beaten up his ex-wife. For many what had happened, might be the terrible conclusion of sexism in society generally. 

Most companies stop celebrities endorsing their products immediately, and it happens even when there’s a whiff of scandal.  In the case of Mr Depp, though, the perfume firm Dior hasn’t.

The back page of the Sunday Times this week

This is the piece, The Eye had published earlier this month —-


A major department store in the capital city of Wales used a picture of shamed actor Johnny Depp to sell eau de toilette despite him losing his bid to appeal against a scathing High Court ruling that he battered his ex-wife 12 times.

A judge at this court decided that The Sun was right to brand Mr Depp a “wife beater” for the brutal attacks on his ex, Amber Heard. In March the court ruled Mr Depp’s appeal had “no real prospect of success”.

However, in defending use of the picture of Mr Depp last month, a John Lewis (JL) representative at the ground floor perfume counter of the store in Cardiff, told The Eye’s Editor Phil Parry: “He (Johnny Deppwas never charged”!

‘He was never charged’!

Apart from this response, the main media relations department of the shop appeared to be less than willing to give a full statement about the situation.

Mr Parry, asked the JL Press Office (PO) for an explanation of the policy, and was told the same day, that the issue would be ‘looked into. At the same time he was asked to provide a deadline.

This was the response from the JL PO which is meant to serve the media: “Hello Phil, Thank you for your email and getting in touch. We will look into this for you – please could you let me know what your deadline is? 

“Press Office
John Lewis & Partners
External Communications
171 Victoria Street, London, SW1E 5NN
Direct: 01344 82 5080
Internal: 742 – 5080
Out of office hours: 
020 7592 6994 for John Lewis 
01344 82 5922 for Waitrose”.

Amber Heard – a picture tells a thousand words

The immediate reply from Mr Parry was that the statement should be given ‘ASAP’, however, nothing has been provided.

In the original libel case last year, the judge Mr Justice Nicol concluded Mr Depp had beaten Ms Heard 12 out of 14 times – starting in 2013 when he slapped the actress after she made a comment about his tattoo. He dismissed two allegations made by Ms Heard in 2014 and 2015, but said he couldn’t conclude she had been “untruthful”.

The judge also found Mr Depp put his ex-wife in “fear for her life” on three occasions – including during a “three-day hostage situation” in Australia in March 2015, where £120,000 worth of damage was caused to their rented home. Mr Justice Nicol ruled that Mr Depp attacked Ms Heard 12 times during their relationship, and that The Sun article about the assaults, was “substantially true”. These were:

  1. In early 2013, Mr Depp slapped and knocked Ms Heard to the ground after she made a joke about his “Wino Forever” tattoo.
  2. In March 2013, Mr Depp flew into a rage while high on drugs and hit Ms Heard so hard he made her lip bleed.
  3. In June 2013, Mr Depp attacked Ms Herd in a trailer at Hicksville – throwing glasses at her and ripping her dress.
  4. In May 2014, Mr Depp screamed at her on a private jet after taking drugs and boozing before kicking her in the back or bum.
  5. In 2014, Mr Depp grabed Ms Heard by the hair, slapped her and pushed her to the ground on a detox trip to the Bahamas.
  6. In January 2015, Mr Depp again attacked Ms Heard while on drugs – this time slapping her and pushing her to the ground. He then stood over her yelling.
  7. In March 2015, Mr Depp launched into a brutal three-day attack in Australia – leaving Ms Heard with a broken lip, swollen nose and cuts all over her body. He trashed the house in a violent rampage and pushed her to the ground, choking her and spitting in her face as he made Ms Heard “fear for her life”.
  8. In March 2015 in the couple’s LA home, Mr Depp grabbed Ms Heard in front of her sister and repeatedly hit her.
  9. In August 2015 on the couple’s honeymoon, Mr Depp pushed Ms Heard against a wall by grabbing her by the throat.
  10. In December 2015, Mr Depp chucked a glass decanter at Ms Heard at their LA home in a drug binge. He also slapped her and dragged her through the apartment by her hair – ripping a chunk out. He then hit her again in the back of the head and headbutted her in the face and screamed “I will f***ing kill you”. Mr Depp then pushed her face into a mattress and repeatedly punched her in the back of the head.
  11. In April 2016 at Ms. Heard’s birthday party, Mr Depp assaulted her after receiving “grim news” about his finances.
  12. In May 2016, Mr Depp chucked a phone at Ms Heard – injuring her eye – before pulling her hair and striking her.

The judge dismissed two allegations made by Ms Heard, but did not conclude she had been untruthful. These were:

  1. In December 2014, Ms Heard claimed Mr Depp was “violent towards” her, and later branded himself a “f***ing savage”. This is, perhaps, appropriate given that the perfume Mr Depp advertises is ‘Sauvage’.
  2. In November 2015, she said Mr Depp “threw her around the room” and pushed her over a chair.
Amber Heard – how unpleasant

For his part, since the assaults Mr Depp has said he has been through “an unpleasant and messy situation”,  and is facing a Hollywood “boycott”.

It also appears that legal problems continue to beset him. Mr Depp faces another battle in the US next year – a $50 million defamation lawsuit has been lodged against Ms Heard over a Washington Post opinion piece on domestic abuse.